|
|
Pocket-Sized Wonders
My sister Alicia simply adores her Canon Powershot
S500, while I bring along my trusty Nikon CoopPix 5200 when I
can do without the weight, bulk or conspicuity of my SLRs. These two
petite cameras feature 1/1.8" CCD sensors with 5.0 megapixels, 3x
optical zoom, multiple preset automated modes, manual exposure control,
red-eye reduction, PictBridge printing, and movie capture. As of Fall
2004, each is priced near $400 before promotional savings.
|
|
|
|
The S500 is just a tad more
sophisticated, with its
slightly wider lens (7.4mm as opposed to 7.8mm), faster processor,
one-button screen-off switch, and more compact dimensions. The 5200,
utilizing the slimmer Secure Data memory card instead of the older Compact
Flash used in the S500, is lighter by a little more than an ounce (5.5
oz). |
|
|
|
|
Canon
PowerShot G-Series
The main attraction of the annual I
Madonnari festival, at the steps of the Mission Santa Barbara,
California, is the rendition of Italian renaissance
masterpieces as billboards of local organizations and
businesses, drawn in chalk on pavement. Here, fellow digital
photographer Michel took a very low-profile shot with the same
camera model I used to take the picture seen at left on the 26th of May,
2002: the Canon Powershot G1.
It was my third digital camera since 1998, an
upgrade from the Canon Pro70. My anxiety over its
thin plastic construction was alleviated once it survived a
Norwegian coastal voyage inside my raincoat pocket. It has a
f/2 7-21mm optical zoom (equivalent of 34-104mm in 35mm SLRs), a
swiveling LCD screen, 3.34Mp resolution, CompactFlash memory (which I've been
using since the ancient Kodak DC205), built-in flash, and hot
shoe.
Practically obsolete the moment it hit the
stores, the G1
has been succeeded in just one year by the
G2 (4.0Mp, more efficient power consumption). The
relentless march of progress continues with the G3 (35-144mm equivalent f/2 lens, improved
DIGIC processor), the G5 (5.0Mp), and in 2004, the G6
(7.2Mp).
One can assume there was no "G4"
because of the Asian superstition regarding that number, which
rhymes with "death" in Chinese and Japanese. The more
pertinent point is that, incredibly, 5-megapixel resolution has
now become the standard for digital imaging even at the consumer
level, averaging $350 in 2004.
|
|
It's
lonely at the head of the pack
The digital camera is the biggest thing in consumer electronics
since the audio CD. Giant Japanese and Korean corporations like Sony,
Matsushita (Panasonic), Sanyo and Samsung are reaping from
this generous bonanza, but not without a little help from the German establishment. Witness the labels Carl Zeiss, Schneider-Kreuznach
and even Leica emblazoned on their $200-$1000 cameras. Is it too good to be true, when
one Leica
M lens alone -- minus the camera -- is priced anywhere from $700 to
$2700?
These marriages of convenience may seem beneath Kyoto
Ceramics, or Kyocera. Japan's pre-eminent answer to Leica
in luxurious, supremely crafted and unaffordable 35mm optics, it has been
carrying on the legendary Contax label with Carl Zeiss T* lenses for
decades, and its
well-fortified foray into the digital jungle under the same premise is no
gimmick. It has to share the exclusive T* optics with Sony
now, however.
No less audacious is Cosina's attempt to travel
back in time, producing a line of affordable rangefinders to accept Leica,
Contax and Nikon lenses of yore -- under its own subversively
Teutonic brand, the Voigtländer Bessa.
|
|
Same
camera, dressed up and down -- The 4.0Mp CCD engineering is provided
by Panasonic, and the 3x f/2 Vario-Summicron is furnished by Leica. Hmm, I
wonder which one is the $900 Digilux 1, and which is the $760 DMC-LC5?
The union of
high-precision optics and ever-evolving digital technology is spawning
more of these inter-corporate hybrids in every camera category, from
point-and-shoots to medium format. |
|
|
|
In any case, turnabout is both fair play and a telling tribute
to Japan's fine optics. Hewlett-Packard uses
Pentax lenses,
and Kodak's professional digital SLRs stay true to the
original source: their metering systems and lens mounts are pure Nikon.
As the elite Contax cameras would attest, European camera makers are
quite willing to concede to Japan's manufacturing prowess. It is Fujifilm
that supplies the body and lenses for Hasselblad's well-received X-Pan
and now, the auto-focusing H1. Panasonic, playing second
fiddle to Sony in almost every regard, wins the trust of Leica
to produce its elegant 4Mp Digilux 1, stylized as a postmodern
rangefinder (see above).
Canon
still puts its own name on every aspect of its products, and its products
only (exception: Casio now uses Canon lenses). It was the first to produce optics with quiet,
belt-driven (hence "ultrasonic") motors, image stabilization,
and auto-focusing tracked by the movement of one's eye. It ruled the APS
film format during its heyday with its adorable Elphs, which
now sport 1/1.8", 5.0-megapixel CCDs.
Canon's foothold in the chip business is
well served by its proprietary DIGIC processor in its every digital camera
since 2002. It is the first major camera maker to stake
its future on CMOS* chips, with two entry-level digital SLRs adopting this newer
and cheaper technology. One, the D60, was the first to sell
below $2500, a significant threshold back in 2001. The other, the
digitization of its wildly popular Rebel (remember Andre Agassi
with Van Halen hair back in those late-'80s adverts?), was the first to
slip below $1K in time for Christmas of 2003.
On the other extreme is the Ferrari of professional field
photographers, at least until the end of next year: the EOS1D Mark II,
with its 1.3x factor 8.2Mp CMOS sensor capable of capturing 40 8Mp images
at 8.5 frames-per-second burst mode, and a tough, gasket-sealed body made
of magnesium alloy. Expect to fork over more than $4K for this baby,
lenses not included.
*CCD = Charged Capacitance Device, CMOS = Complementary Metal
Oxide Semiconductor
|
|
MY CAMERAS TRAVELOGUE TITLE PAGE CONNECTIONS
INDEX |
|
Source:
Popular Photography and Imaging, December 2002, March 2004
This web site is not affiliated
with any of the companies cited herein, and is neither an official
representation nor an endorsement of any of the said companies and their
products.
|
|